THE job of the appraisal committee is limited to identifying the physical characteristics of a property and its subsequent market value in relation to the assessment.
This does not include a survey of the property, which is normally done by a geodetic engineer, said Engr. Anthony Sususco, chief of the Provincial Assessor's Office.
This is why the committee, which is chaired by Sususco and with Provincial Treasurer Roy Salubre and Provincial Engingeer Eulogio Pelayre as members, did not see parts of the Balili property that were submerged in water.
Sususco revealed the tasks of the appraisal committee in accordance with the late president Corazon Aquino's executive order and a memorandum of former Cebu governor Pablo Garcia, now representative of the second district of Cebu, on the composition and function of the provincial appraisal committee.
The committee's jobs are to conduct an ocular inspection on private properties to be acquired for public use by any government agency or local government unit; secure data to ascertain fair and current market value a and submit a report to the requesting party in the form value; of a resolution.
"We only recommend the market value. It is not in our mandate to survey or to relocate. Why go beyond our mandate?" Sususco said.
Meanwhile, the executive order forming the committee to investigate the Balili property controversy has officially been released, but certain questions regarding how the probe will be carried out remain unanswered.
National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) 7 Director Medardo de Lemos, the committee's designated chairman, confirmed receipt of the order but declined to answer questions, saying he has yet to meet the others involved.
"It is a collegial body. It is important that we first meet and discuss matters within ourselves," he said.
Gov. Gwendolyn Garcia, in a dyLA interview yesterday, said that although there are so many experts on the matter, there was a presumption of regularity in the functions of the officials involved.
Capitol consultant Rory Jon Sepulveda explained that all questions raised on the issue would be taken into consideration in the fact-finding investigation of the Capitol.
He said that it is easy to say that a survey should have been done before the purchase of the property, but when there is a presumption of regularity, there is no need to scrutinize the process, especially since they had clean titles that were released by the Register of Deeds.
The fact-finding investigation, headed by de Lemos, is not going to sanction the officials concerned. The results will only be utilized as a "management tool" of the governor.
According to the resolution of the appraisal committee, the zonal value of the Balili property was P1,500 but the schedule of market value listed only P370 per square meter. Opinion value was at P450 per square meter.
The property was officially sold at P400 per square meter.
Garcia signed the memorandum of agreement for the sale before April 21, through an authority passed by the Provincial Board (PB) on Jan. 14, 2008. The January authority was for the Province to buy the Balili property at P434 per square meter, which Garcia rejected.
An amended resolution was then passed specifying that the sale would now be for P400 per square meter - an amendment that the governor and Provincial Atty. Marino Martinquilla said was not necessary.
This is why a ratification was not needed.
"Ratification applies only when there is no authority," said Martinquilla.
But if ratification was indeed needed, Garcia asked why the MOA was not taken from her.
"Shall I physically bring it because I never prevented anybody from taking it... They (PB) have never asked for a ratification," said Garcia.
No haste
Garcia also questioned why PB Member Juan Bolo, who was responsible for making the MOA and the deed of sale, did not seek the ratification.
The officials also clarified insinuations they made the deal in haste when the property was introduced to Garcia in 2006 yet.
Sususco even explained that the appraisal was done in July 2007, almost a year before the deal was consummated.
But two questions that the fact-finding need to answer are the scope of the investigation and what powers the committee members possess.
As NBI 7 director, de Lemos has the power to issue a subpoena to people pursuant to matters that the agency is investigating.
But as chairman of the committee, can de Lemos draw power from his other office and that exercise the same the authority?
"These are matters that need to be discussed within the committee first," he said, adding that the members include four lawyers.
Also lawyers who declined to be named, said the committee might not even need to call people, adding that parties-–among them lawyer Romeo Balili and PB Member Juan Bolo-–have already given statements to the PB.
Survey
The lawyers also said the investigation is not criminal in nature as the intent is to guide the governor in implementing measures so that a similar incident won't happen again.
This, they said, is unlike the probe being conducted by the Office of the Ombudsman-Visayas, which while still in fact-finding phase, can be upgraded into formal criminal and administrative proceedings.
The anti-graft office already began its probe and has issued a subpoena to the Office of the Governor to turn over certified true copies of documents pertaining to the multi-million-peso purchase.
It has scheduled a site survey to confirm allegations that the 25-hectare parcel of land included underwater portions.
Graft Investigator Rod Blazo said the probe will also seek to determine if Capitol officials exercised due diligence before embarking on the purchase or simply relied on titles.
Likewise, it will also delve on the individual involvement of certain people in the transaction and determine if these acts were within bounds.
No comments:
Post a Comment